how to disappear completely
Apr. 25th, 2008 09:55 amlistening to jack johnson always makes me want to watch surfing documentaries. step into liquid is my favorite of them, as it is *gorgeous*.
anyway.
The main serious post I keep waffling on making is a little bit about bandom (and right there I've lost a bunch of people) but it is mostly about race and how one of the things that BUGS THE SHIT OUT OF ME about the way fandom treats race is the disappearing of people of color and *especially* the disappearing of biracial people in the larger context of discussion persons and characters of color.
Because see, I'm still really pissed about some comments that were made last year (I can hold a grudge like you wouldn't BELIEVE) about there being no people of color in bandom (Pete Wentz would like to disagree. As would Travis, Ray, Gabe, Alex Suarez, Matt Cortez, Disashi, Brendon, Tyga and others) because they're there. They're *obvious*. FFS, STOP SAYING THEY ARE WHITE. STOP IT. *breathes* In terms of diversity of race/religion/sexuality, bandom *wins forever* over any other popular fandom I've seen. FOREVER. Black, Latino, A/PI, Jewish, atheist, Catholic, undivulged flavor of Christian, mostly straight but NOT ENTIRELY, bi and out, allies and supporters, actual conversations about sexuality and the perceptions thereof. This fandom owns. Also, Greta and Vicky T and Maja do not have penises.
Um. Hey, apparently I started making this post! But okay, here's why it bugs me and I will try to leave it at that: by calling them white, by making the assumption that they are white without bothering to look, people are basically rendering them invisible. And this is doubly troubling to me because for a lot of them, we're talking about people who are biracial and that's got a whole passel of problems that go along with it.
The other thing that just bugs the shit out of me is the continued European assertion that they don't consider latinos to be of color. That's nice. THEY DO. What they perceive trumps what you perceive. Period. And all of the annoyances at the way Americans frame the discussion of race in American terms and all the different contexts in the world doesn't change that latinos from this particular side of the globe DO NOT CONSIDER THEMSELVES WHITE. There are *other* issues at work with which, frankly, I'm not even remotely qualified to talk about , but the primary issue for me is that they are not white. You can say all day long that they would be considered white in Europe and that's nice, but that's problematic in its own way. Other people than me who are smarter and more articulate should discuss this.
(somewhat relatedly, I got an email a while ago about the Jesus Walks vid which basically said that if Gunn's arc had been anything like that on the show, they would have kept watching. Here's the thing: that *was* Gunn's arc on the show. That vid was me attempting to show everyone else the show I had *always been watching*. It was there for everyone to see, Gunn was AMAZING and it made me sad every day in that fandom that people were being all SPIKE and ZOMG ANGEL IS BEIGE and ZOMG LINDSEY and meanwhile my darling was off kicking ass and negotiating the difference between the greater good and uh, what Angel thought was the greater good -- opening an orphange = good! being emo about how you're not sure you're doing good = lame and boy was there more to talk about with moral ambiguity and beigeness there. ANYWAY. This post is more than long enough and I need to get ready for work.)
There's an excellent post here that talks about some of the same issues: http://ohinternets.livejournal.com/38940.html in Psych fandom.
anyway.
The main serious post I keep waffling on making is a little bit about bandom (and right there I've lost a bunch of people) but it is mostly about race and how one of the things that BUGS THE SHIT OUT OF ME about the way fandom treats race is the disappearing of people of color and *especially* the disappearing of biracial people in the larger context of discussion persons and characters of color.
Because see, I'm still really pissed about some comments that were made last year (I can hold a grudge like you wouldn't BELIEVE) about there being no people of color in bandom (Pete Wentz would like to disagree. As would Travis, Ray, Gabe, Alex Suarez, Matt Cortez, Disashi, Brendon, Tyga and others) because they're there. They're *obvious*. FFS, STOP SAYING THEY ARE WHITE. STOP IT. *breathes* In terms of diversity of race/religion/sexuality, bandom *wins forever* over any other popular fandom I've seen. FOREVER. Black, Latino, A/PI, Jewish, atheist, Catholic, undivulged flavor of Christian, mostly straight but NOT ENTIRELY, bi and out, allies and supporters, actual conversations about sexuality and the perceptions thereof. This fandom owns. Also, Greta and Vicky T and Maja do not have penises.
Um. Hey, apparently I started making this post! But okay, here's why it bugs me and I will try to leave it at that: by calling them white, by making the assumption that they are white without bothering to look, people are basically rendering them invisible. And this is doubly troubling to me because for a lot of them, we're talking about people who are biracial and that's got a whole passel of problems that go along with it.
The other thing that just bugs the shit out of me is the continued European assertion that they don't consider latinos to be of color. That's nice. THEY DO. What they perceive trumps what you perceive. Period. And all of the annoyances at the way Americans frame the discussion of race in American terms and all the different contexts in the world doesn't change that latinos from this particular side of the globe DO NOT CONSIDER THEMSELVES WHITE. There are *other* issues at work with which, frankly, I'm not even remotely qualified to talk about , but the primary issue for me is that they are not white. You can say all day long that they would be considered white in Europe and that's nice, but that's problematic in its own way. Other people than me who are smarter and more articulate should discuss this.
(somewhat relatedly, I got an email a while ago about the Jesus Walks vid which basically said that if Gunn's arc had been anything like that on the show, they would have kept watching. Here's the thing: that *was* Gunn's arc on the show. That vid was me attempting to show everyone else the show I had *always been watching*. It was there for everyone to see, Gunn was AMAZING and it made me sad every day in that fandom that people were being all SPIKE and ZOMG ANGEL IS BEIGE and ZOMG LINDSEY and meanwhile my darling was off kicking ass and negotiating the difference between the greater good and uh, what Angel thought was the greater good -- opening an orphange = good! being emo about how you're not sure you're doing good = lame and boy was there more to talk about with moral ambiguity and beigeness there. ANYWAY. This post is more than long enough and I need to get ready for work.)
There's an excellent post here that talks about some of the same issues: http://ohinternets.livejournal.com/38940.html in Psych fandom.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 04:59 pm (UTC)Oh, honey. I think I would believe it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:15 pm (UTC)And then I realized how sad that is, that I can honestly say a fandom that involves lyrics like "what a shame, the poor groom's bride is a whore" and "once a whore you're nothing more" is refreshingly unskanky. and now I'm gonna go listen to my "tired of taking this shit" angry-girl-rock playlist for a bit.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:18 pm (UTC)...oh Paramore. FRONTED BY A GIRL. Still calling other girls whores. *facepalm*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:20 pm (UTC)*sigh* I will probably go climbing back in to my corner of optimism and not headdesking at the world soon. But yeah. Hi :)
*hugs you a lot*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:26 pm (UTC)I've spent much of my life (half) in a place where not only was I an Other, but part of a tiny, tiny minority. It's better now in Seattle. I still get that feeling of Otherness at times, but it's balanced by the other times. So, progress, for me personally, but it is sometimes sigh-worthy.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:32 pm (UTC)Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes! Thank you. There are many things I love about bandom, but this is definitely at the top of that list.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 05:53 pm (UTC)Because, seriously? Seriously? How on earth do people elide reality like that? Is this a case of "bandom only consists of the people we're interested in, and by that we mean white dudes"?
Because, EW.
This kind of attitude is why I started and will continue to do a female vocalists music post every month.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 06:19 pm (UTC)I also think the UK as a whole is too Euro-centric which adds to the problem. But don't get me started on politics!
Sorry that sounds a bit defensive, but I was feeling that way a bit. Even if you're educating us one at a time we (who read your LJ) are listening, and we aren't saying you're wrong or that the people you're talking about are wrong. I'm saying that last time you changed how I thought about this, and that means I can change the mind of the next person and the next and the next. And we'll get there.
Also, please don't hate me because I'm inarticulate and come from a stupid country.
Incidentally to another bit of your post, please feel free to love on Gunn muchly. He was the best character in the entire damn show (I have a hate for Angel like you wouldn't believe) and needs more love and some day someone'll write the Xander/Gunn fic I want.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 06:29 pm (UTC)And it's not that I think the UK should have Latino as a separate option because it's not as large an issue for you there as it is for us here, but other/having to define is a far cry from white and that feels a lot like what some of the Europeans are saying when they say that Hispanic, for them, is the same as white.
I don't know. I am not being very articulate either. I don't hate you! I think you are very very awesome.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 06:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 06:33 pm (UTC)i still, for the record, hate, despise, and cannot listen to"build god, and then we'll talk," both for the lyrics and the disgusting, horrifying pornomime video.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 06:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 07:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 07:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 07:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 07:49 pm (UTC)Perhaps we should make a bandom chart? Guys in Bandom Who are White / Everyone else. We could illustrate with their pictures and give little stats on the way they are not white guys.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 09:03 pm (UTC)Europe has it's share of people of a differnt from white-white hue if you want to call it that. Italians, Turks, Greeks for example. And while there are some of collective insults (fe tschusch means stranger and covers a lot of white Eastern European minorities too), in general people don't have a problem seeing them as European and more importantly do indentify them with their home country (including in their insults). It's like if Americans actually distinguished between Mexicans, Bolivians, Chileans and Argentians and identified them each based on their history (though admittedly that between Italians, Turks and Greeks, they each speak a different language and have a different religion which probably makes things much easier).
I don't think it's an attempt to be politically correct nor an attempt to gloss over differences. It just that for them this hue totally falls into something that is within their experience of "Europeans like us/a relative of mine might pop up looking similar to that" and for example isn't recognized as a very different beauty standard.
But usually when the topic is brought up people bring up the shared history aspect. Yet isn't that exactly the thing that makes it a historical/cultural issue than (just) a color issue? Hence, isn't it misnamed?
"We do not have the race issues that you have in the US!" because that treads alarmingly close to the bad kind of "color-blindness."
There is a difference between saying that they don't have race issues and saying that their race issues look different. And they are. You have very different population percentages for starters. You have different backgrounds (descendants of slaves vs. immigrants). You have different socio-economic distributions (the cheap labour jobs that might be taken by Mexicans in the US used to be taken (sometimes still are) by Eastern Europeans who are white in Europe for a long time). Some race issues are universal. But a lot of them are also heavily influenced by the local situation. So, hell yeah, of course the race issues would be different. It's a different places with different histories aftre all.
The UK has race/ethnicity issues that are unique to them (immigrants from India and Pakistan because of the unique history they share). France has race/ethnicity issues that are unique to them (immigrants from North Africa and a handful of island territories which still belong to France and where the inhabitants are still full French citizens). And they issues are different from the ones you might encounter in Sweden or Germany or Russia. Sometimes there are similarities and sometimes there really is no equivalent.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 10:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-25 11:30 pm (UTC):D
Cookies? Of the cyber persuasion?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-26 12:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-26 01:25 am (UTC)The Pete thing is interesting, because I think if you met him or just knew him casually you wouldn't necessarily know he wasn't white, but in the context of his (upper middle class) community, with people knowing what his parents looked like? I'd imagine it'd make an impact.