it's the end of the world as we know it
Jan. 21st, 2008 09:55 pmThings I have learned about how to survive the apocalypse, assuming I make it past the initial apocalyptic event:
1) Go to Hoover Dam powered areas. Mostly automated power generation. At least until the tiny mollusks kill it. Still though, that's a year. Long enough to scavenge and learn other things.
2) Do not become fond of highly bred dogs.
3) Scavenge grocery stores early.
4) within a year or so, plants start taking over civilization and crumbling buildings. OH APOCALYPSES. HOW SO AWESOME. Within 5 years = nada.
5) So Cal will be taken out by wildfires. Like always.
6) Avoid places with large zoos. Escondido = right out.
7) Feral dogs are a danger.
8) Some cities will be under water.
So, my plan for the apocalypse is essentially to pick people up and head to Vegas/Lake Mead to scavenge. And then probably up north where there's more fresh water and a more hospitable climate. What I'm now trying to decide is if it is easier to maintain a massive but existing infrastructure or to try to construct a new, small-scale one.
Poor Manhattan. It totally gets a raw deal apocalyptically. I suppose that's what one gets for being an island.
eta: Dear History Channel, what is this bullshit no remnants thing? HELLO, DID YOU NOT CONSULT ANY ARCHAEOLOGISTS?
eta2: The scottish engineer is hilaaaaaaarious.
eta3: dude. History Channel. THIS IS BAD RESEARCH. I mean, seriously, talk to an archaeologist once in a while!
eta4: i really kind of wish this had been a Discovery Channel show instead. Then it would have higher production values and probably better science. But maybe no scottish engineer.
eta5: HOLY SHIT THAT WAS SOME AWFUL, HISTRIONIC "SCIENCE." IT WAS "ARE YOU SHITTING ME?!?" LEVELS OF BAD SCIENCE.
1) Go to Hoover Dam powered areas. Mostly automated power generation. At least until the tiny mollusks kill it. Still though, that's a year. Long enough to scavenge and learn other things.
2) Do not become fond of highly bred dogs.
3) Scavenge grocery stores early.
4) within a year or so, plants start taking over civilization and crumbling buildings. OH APOCALYPSES. HOW SO AWESOME. Within 5 years = nada.
5) So Cal will be taken out by wildfires. Like always.
6) Avoid places with large zoos. Escondido = right out.
7) Feral dogs are a danger.
8) Some cities will be under water.
So, my plan for the apocalypse is essentially to pick people up and head to Vegas/Lake Mead to scavenge. And then probably up north where there's more fresh water and a more hospitable climate. What I'm now trying to decide is if it is easier to maintain a massive but existing infrastructure or to try to construct a new, small-scale one.
Poor Manhattan. It totally gets a raw deal apocalyptically. I suppose that's what one gets for being an island.
eta: Dear History Channel, what is this bullshit no remnants thing? HELLO, DID YOU NOT CONSULT ANY ARCHAEOLOGISTS?
eta2: The scottish engineer is hilaaaaaaarious.
eta3: dude. History Channel. THIS IS BAD RESEARCH. I mean, seriously, talk to an archaeologist once in a while!
eta4: i really kind of wish this had been a Discovery Channel show instead. Then it would have higher production values and probably better science. But maybe no scottish engineer.
eta5: HOLY SHIT THAT WAS SOME AWFUL, HISTRIONIC "SCIENCE." IT WAS "ARE YOU SHITTING ME?!?" LEVELS OF BAD SCIENCE.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 02:38 pm (UTC)The History Channel is just embarrassing. I only watch XY Factor or The History of Sex, because then at least there are badly researched boobs.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 05:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 03:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 05:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 03:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 05:10 pm (UTC)er. and weaponry. And I think cookery would be enough!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 07:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 04:31 pm (UTC)I am not noticing any plans to deal with 40,000-year-old partially-frozen alien-possessed mammoths, which is why I ask.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 05:11 pm (UTC)*nuzzles*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 08:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-23 02:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-22 11:39 pm (UTC)'It's like an instructional film on what NOT to do in the event of an apocalypse!'
Seriously. That movie kicked ass, but the characters were so STUPID.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-23 02:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-23 07:54 am (UTC)The last few months the media has given one depiction of the destruction of New York City after another. Stop picking on my city, please.
Part of the problem is being an island and a lot of the rest is having honeycombed its foundations with subway tunnels held up by metal girders. By the standards of the last bit, much of Midtown would sink once the girders give out, especially around Grand Central Station.
The wolf-dogs hunting near the end was an especially cheesy computer animation. Geez.